Legislative

| Parlianent! Sides
“Victoria,
V8V' 1x4

1.83, No, 1

dy col piled con:
otential socio-

prope ed Murphy reek hydroel
Cre oul

ise the impact’ of the propo:
lands and properties will be perpen in‘ter-
‘ms'of potential as well.as present value iey're
Thosejare among the revelations in a - some of the potential value ‘of some of the land thi
ewly-released, 30-page. report on B.C. feed. That's good, that's! where potential
ydro's terms of reference for studying the. “Terms of reference for stud:
projected environmental impact of construc- -
‘ting the proposed 400-mill/watt darn about 23,
kilometres downstream from Costlegar. on the
‘columbia’ River. i . related to reduction’ in’ power. outp' ‘due
ment lays’ down ‘ > procedures _ undertaken” from’, the al,
detailed exdmination, starting ithis year, of. SO7RTS .
eth fect: the project would have'on all fands. 2g ‘the cost of patting that in‘as pi
ither side’ of: the Columbia from the Oasis . mitigation f the impact of the dam,” she: said.
area‘upstream to the Hugh Keenleyside Dam”
‘and up. te the Brilliant’ Dar i on. the Kootenay

ly? ater and’a target schedule ‘ showing specific
déadlines will! be be: issued for study. of each aspect. of the -
vironmental impac
But

‘potectial a the Murphy
‘proposal document's introduction saya arbitrati
preliminary engineering and environmental ‘studies were],
‘carried ont in 1977/and 1978 “to examine the project potential:
‘at ase lity, rel and tify } bi

4 ipa
ject actions asséciated with the: development.”
“These shall include pre-project activities such as field
investigation or land | acquisition, construction activities, such
‘site and reservoir 1oarin es) dam, : ipow erhouse and roads

f Rene Arc
Sey: just what went ‘on.” said the investigator
“Asked about’ an earlier who! completed: a two-day.
report that Sons of Freedom, ite. “inspection » of th
‘were the-focus
elles ohemenny he’ -probably release the: pare

of his report witl
nae prseks.s

talks c without, tting "into
4 “Asked whether, he. still ministration Teese Ss ition cc ‘ent
suspected arson as the eause./" “and according to faculty: : ;
xo of the fire, he said he had ‘not negotiator Ger Van Beynutn;
seen: anything come -Up' t0 the 110 association members,
working | without a “contract
ince April 31; 1979, hope the
-administration’s position has *
“changed enough to avert the Lof ‘Castlegar:
trike they’ have authorized ' board are. te ‘nioment a good WW
in the event their concesstons ~ inthe. association will seek hind Trail
sare not met. talks,
‘Asked whether: faculty: |:
association members, who on
Dec. 37 :voted'75. per. cent.in’

4: favor of a strike, are actually’ offea ‘onl
fy Prepared to go on strike, Van’ Looe ie stor
(u’Beynum* noted the’ associ- ‘tn’
tion is “more militant than it
has ever been before.”
“Whether we would real-
7] ly goon strike and shut down
"the entire operation : of} th attend i
where in. n sessions ‘of the college.
n Beyaumm' tala they ran not the closed ses-

dryer, ory
“with period ‘of snow ‘ani rails.
‘ “forthe - weekend.:'.Daytime ~
™ highs“ of 3° with’ overnight.
lows near, 0°: and in29,

esas Date
Entertaionent - .