Saturday, March 28, 1992 @ -OurViEWS AdrianRAESIDE NDP drops the TFL ball f nothing else, the New Democratic government is consistent. Friday, Forests Minister Dan Miller helped the _ fledgling government maintain a perfect record in Castlegar, delaying a decision on Pope and Talbot’s purchase of our sawmili and Tree Farm Licence No. 23. The delay, coupled with rejection of the Robson ferry and the Castlegar-Robson bridge, gives the Mike Harcourt-led forces a 3-for-3 record regarding affairs in our region. ‘ What gut-wrenching decisions lay ahead for the New Democrats, who knows. The only thing that is known is the ballots cast during the Oct. 17 provincial election have been a complete waste of time. Castlegar and area have been betrayed by the very party it has had a love affair with for longer than anyone can remember. But Castlegar isn’t the only one being betrayed, just ask Rossland-Trail MLA Ed Conroy. Conroy can’t and shouldn’t be blamed for the blunders of his party. As our local representative, Conroy deserves cheers not jeers for the endless hours he has put in on our behalf. As a backbencher, there is precious er Mle lly rays “ly ten “lly “Ultyyyy, a ys uy, ns AM wan a Bacay: Marek’ 28, toon 4The News Evans subtle appeals have charm Corky Evans as a TV apple growers. They’re all huckster? That’s right. Then again, maybe huckster isn’t the right word. Let’s just say that the Nelson-Creston MLA with the down-home approach to politics has started to use television to get a message across. And while Kevin Costner doesn’t have to look over his shoulder, Evans manages to do a pretty good job. Ron NORMAN (_-} conte from the Crossroads just sitting around one of the apple bins in their baseball caps and work jackets — Evans included. Heck, it’s hard to pick out which is Evans and which are the apple growers. But then he stands up ‘-and-walks toward the | camera telling us that it’s | important to buy | Canadian products whenever we can. ‘eer Just what is his job? Trying to stop the flood of Canadians crossing into the U.S. +h to do The second commercial — I’ve only seen two, but there may be more — shows Evans talking little Conroy can do to bend the government’s arm. He is quickly discovering that. During his short-term, Ed Conroy has served his constituency with honesty and integrity — it’s a shame his party won’t do the same. Hy Lh their shopping: Evans doesn’t come right out and tell us not to shop Stateside. That would probably just get people’s backs up and do more harm than good: nobody likes to be told what they should do. He has a more sophisticated approach. And he carries it off well. In one commercial he speaks with some with-a family of dairy farmers. Once again he’s dressed pretty much like the farmers and they discuss. ‘how important it is to buy Canadian to keep jobs not just in Canada, but in the Kootenays. The ads are sophisticated in that they appeal to us both on an emotional level and an intellectual level. please see Norman page 6 Street TALK Joan Beck Campbell River “That would be a really tough Chris Nolan Castlegar “NDP.” Question: How would you vote if a federal election was held next month? Ted Evans Castlegar “I’m not too sure I'd vote.” Norma Dodgson Bev Perepolkin Warfield Thrums “NDP.” “I'd vote for Audrey su 99 OtherVl ewe! Please address all letters to: Letters to the ditor . Castlegar News P.O. Box 3007 Castlegar, B.C. V1iN 3H4 or deliver the 197 Columbia Ave. Letters should be typewritten, double-spaced and not longer than 300 words. Letters MUST be signed and include the writer's first and last names, address and a telephone number at which the writer can be reached between 9a.m. and 5 p.m. The writer’s name and city or town of residence only will be published. Only in exceptional cases will letters be published anonymously. Even in those cases, the name, | addressand phone number of the writer MUST -—— be ‘disclosed to . the editor. The News reserves the right to edit letters for brevity, clarity, legality, grammar everyone’s satisfaction. - After a short break the regular meeting : Letters coVHE EDITOR CURB demanding answers The evening began with a presentation of the proposed Castlegar Centre Mall by Jim Laing. Area representative, Terry Moon,- followed with a presentation of behalf of the residents wanting assurance that their quality of life would not be affected. Moon was very reasonable and I am sure that after a meeting with Laing the two groups will be able to work things out to 3. No alarms or exhaust fans, 4. Lighting is not adequate, 5. No space for painting, 6. Poor land use and finally, _1. Must store equipment out in the cold. Our point is this: the above reasons are not so great that they cannot be dealt with and the corrections and cost would certainly in no way approach anywhere near a million dollars. . To say to a person who already owns a lot in the south end that you cannot build She wondered why most of the arrangements had been made without consultation with council and without council’s approval. She asked many questions and as a spectator I don’t think she got the answers she was looking for — join the crowd. Sounds to me, Alderman Smecher could qualify for a membership in CURB — ask questions, get no answers. Hang in there Alderman Smecher, you are doing a good job. of council began. After the usual proclamations were disposed of, a presentation on the Interior Access Network was presented by Cathy Lafortune and Kris Stanbra. Well done and very informative and congratulations to Stanbra on her appointment. Now as the council got into the meat of the meeting, things got a little more complicated. After two very informative reports by Joon Bahk and Barry Comin, some very important information that CURB has been asking questions on has now been documented, and CURB has been saying since its inception, there is a problem in the south end in relation to development in regards to the sewer treatment capacity. It is serious enough that if three major projects continue ahead all development in the south end could be stopped until the sewer facility is expanded. With this information before council, council authorized Comin to proceed immediately to obtain the necessary information. Now, bearing this in mind and also the cost of such an expansion, (the council hopes it will come in under a half a million dollars) what does our illustrious do... ? They authorize $91,500 in fees for the to Advance Building Systems of Kelowna for $950,200 for the construction of a new city works facility to be located on prime industrial park land. The reasons given for moving the works facility are: 1. shop floor is cold and pitted, 2. No shielded area for welding, because the city cannot provide a sewer connection is ludicrous. It seems to us that a city is duty bound to provide water and sewer to its citizens, that is what we pay taxes for, isn’t it. In order for a city to grow it must have serviceable property for people to buy and be able to build upon. By adding new residences or businesses we are increasing our tax base and our city will grow and with the increase in the tax base we will continue to enjoy the services that we not only want but deserve. If we continue to allow our council to do as they please, we will pay higher taxes for the simple-reason that they have not been setting ‘priorities and listening to what the citizens are saying. The executive of CURB at the direction of our membership has been lobbying alderman on the many issues that have come up over the past few months. Prior to the council meeting of March 17, I received assurance from one alderman that he was in fact going to vote against the city works facility and that he had a commitment from another alderman to do the same. Well, when the vote was taken, he voted yes on all recommendations as well as the rest of council. Not one word was spoken against the move and not even a mention of dissatisfaction of an izen or group It akon one wonder if council is listening to or reading the briefs that have been submitted. On a final note and nearing the end of the meeting, Alderman Smecher questioned the chair on what the procedures were for the planned trip to China. Michael O’Connor President Citizens Unaccepting Rash Bureaucracy Fair representation needed During January and February, the Mulroney government sponsored five weekend conferences on the constitution, misleadingly calling them “constituent assemblies.” But the vast majority attending the meetings were hand-picked “constitutional experts” and activists from special-interest groups. Only a few so-called ordinary Canadians were allowed to attend. In no way, consequently, could these meetings be said to represent the wishes of Canada’s electorate. For a constituent assembly to be called as such, it must be elected. Representatives from each federal riding should. be elected directly by the people to carry out proposed amendments to our Constitution. After the constituent assembly meets, the proposed amendments would then be subject to ratification by each province ina general referendum. We nd it ironi ha he M government — so eager to raise taxes on Canadians — would see fit to deny over- burdened taxpayers the right to elect: constituent assembly representatives and to vote on constitutional referenda. David Murrell The Northern Foundation Research Officer Norman and taste. continued from page 6 They are positive — telling us to buy Canadian, rather than trying to tell us that we shouldn’t buy in the U.S. What is strange is seeing a politician who isn’t out plugging himself. We're not used to seeing local politicians in TV commercials. I can’t ever recall seeing former cabinet minister Howard Dirks on TY, , et alone former D’Arcy. Aud the only time we ever see provincial politicians on TV is when they are telling us what a great job they are doing and boasting about all the new programs they’ve put in place — as if the money for those programs came out of their own pocket and not ours’. Instead, Evans’ concern is about cross-border shopping. And it’s a valid concern. On any Sunday afternoon you can see the cars lined up at the Patterson border crossing waiting to declare all the items they just picked up in the U.S. Like Evans, I’m not about to tell Canadians what they should do. Most people work hard for their money and should De a Owed see fit. Fair enough. Besides, I like to go to Spokane as much as anybody. It’s different. And it can be fun. We go about once a year and make a holiday of it. And we like to shop when we're there. Not that the prices for what we buy —- mainly o spend as tney clothes — are all that much better, but because the styles are different and there’s more selection. I would be the last one to suggest that we shouldn’t go to Spokane for a holiday and not spend any money there. I know. our local merchants expect Americans to spend a certain amount of money when they visit. But I dont believe in making hae hig ticket terre like Aa as or kitchen cabinets, or hopping across to Northport to fill up with gas and groceries. I like the social programs we have in Canada and I believe we have to pay for them. I think people who make a habit of shopping in the U.S. while accepting our social programs are people who aren’t paying their way. They want something for nothing. One argument I’ve heard in favor of shopping in the U.S. is that the cost of living in Canada is getting so high people can’t get by any other way. I have to chuckle at that because my sister-in-law in Fraser Lake seems to get by — aria Srne adoes cre ox V of shopping in the U. S. And all her neighbors seem to get by. And so do all the hundreds of thousands of peeple in all the other communities across Canada that aren’t within easy driving of the border. So keep those commercials coming Corky. TV